Fact-checking scientific papers

Journals regularly use automated software to check for plagiarized submissions. New tools are being developed to check for image manipulation. Recently, two groups proposed to go further: automate the process of fact-checking in research papers. 
One of the tools compares the reported statistical ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values, to see if these numbers are compatible, i.e. could have been calculated from the same data set. This way it helps to spot calculation and reporting errors, which can slip through the standard peer review. 
The second tool performs a check of nucleotide sequences that authors submit with their papers to the molecular biology journals. The long chains of G, T, A and C letters cannot be checked by human reviewers, but are fairly easily processed with software, which can check for example if the sequence reported really corresponds to the gene studied in the paper.
The error rate is currently too large to incorporate these tools into a standard journal w…

Applications open for Cochrane REWARD prizes

Pilot between ResearchGate and Springer Nature begins

Guidelines for open peer review implementation

EASE Statement of endorsement of the Leiden Declaration on Transparent Journal Policies

Cochrane-REWARD prize 2019 opens for nominations

PEERE in 1 minute - The dialogue of peer review

Introducing our Turkish and Vietnamese Regional Chapters

METM19 call for conference proposals

European Science Editing issue 45(1) released

How to choose a journal and write a cover letter

National Indexing Day 2019

Open Access on the rise