Rich MW. Plagiarism in an article: Is there any evidence? Medical
Hypotheses 2007;69:1154-62. doi: 10.1016/m.mehy.2007.05.039
Authors of a published paper "relied heavily" on this author's earlier
publication, and also violated other authors' copyright. In an apologetic
reply, published without editing (pp1155-6; doi
10.1016/jmehy.2007.06.024), the Chinese authors say: "The full
understanding of citation model as well as language problem (English is
not native language) for us may also be principle reasons for those
mistakes."
posted for Margaret Cooter
Hypotheses 2007;69:1154-62. doi: 10.1016/m.mehy.2007.05.039
Authors of a published paper "relied heavily" on this author's earlier
publication, and also violated other authors' copyright. In an apologetic
reply, published without editing (pp1155-6; doi
10.1016/jmehy.2007.06.024), the Chinese authors say: "The full
understanding of citation model as well as language problem (English is
not native language) for us may also be principle reasons for those
mistakes."
posted for Margaret Cooter
Comments