Posts

B - Medical deontology and ethics

on
0

B - Public access to clinical study results

on
0

B - Peer review quality

on
0

B - What researchers perceive as unpublishable research

on
0

B - Research data and publishing

on
0

B - Writing style: abstract thoughts

on
0

B - Evidence-based medicine in crisis?

on
0

B - Academia gets social

on
0

B - The peer review scam

on
0

B - Publishing and evidence-based medicine in Asia

on
0

B - The top 100 papers

on
0

B - Compliance of retraction notices with COPE guidelines

on
0

B - Health news and academic press releases

on
0

B - Five-step authorship framework

on
0

B - The rise of predatory publishers

on
0

B - Visibility of Argentinean publications

on
0

B - Rubriq: a peer review service

on
0

B - Research credibility

on
0

B - How to develop high-quality, ethical clinical manuscripts

on
0

B - Retraction notices and COPE guidelines

on
0

B - Wikipedia citations in journal articles

on
0

B - Science publishing in Russia

on
0

B - The Kardashian index

on
0

B - Publication bias in social sciences

on
0

B - Social media use by medical students

on
0

B - Peer review for RCT

on
0

B - Impact factor mania

on
0

B - An example of unethical behaviour

on
0

B - Plagiarism and ethics

on
0

B - Scholarly publishing trends 2014

on
0

B - Science transparency

on
0

B - Lay summaries of OA articles

on
0

B - Periodicals price survey 2014

on
0

B - Recommended procedures for retracting articles

on
0

B - The impact of retraction

on
0

B - Retractions of scientific publications

on
0

B - Quality of author guidelines

on
0

B - Publishing ethics

on
0

B - Publication ethics in Iranian journals

on
0

B - Publishing strategies

on
0

B - Creative Commons and open access

on
0

B - Peer review and visibility

on
0

B - Good clinical practice

on
0

B - Study design in biomedical and health research

on
0

B - Authorship attitudes and practice in Norway

on
0

B - Plagiarism and retraction

on
0

B - English for medical purposes

on
0

B - Publication in PNAS

on
0

B - Mistakes in manuscripts on education and rejection

on
0

B - Defining and responding to plagiarism

on
0

B - Upgrading instructions for authors

on
0

B - Review of Wikipedia citations in health science literature

on
0

B - Citation increments between collaborating countries

on
0

B - Internet publicity of data problems and corrective actions

on
0

B - Ethics of scholarly publishing

on
0

B - Privacy protectionism and health information

on
0

B - Science journalism

on
0

B - Editorial research and publication process

on
0

B - Citation-related characteristics in scientific journals

on
0

B - Impact of article language in medical journals

on
0

B - Open access respiratory journals

on
0

B - How to read health care news stories

on
0

B - Publication guidelines for industry medical research

on
0

B - Guidance on research integrity in Europe

on
0

B - Why growing retractions are a good sign

on
0

B - Cheating in publications

on
0

B - How to be a top journal

on
0

B - Conflict of interest disclosure form

on
0

B - The first scientific journal

on
0

B - Conflicts of interest in high-impact biomedical journals

on
0

B - Online-to-print delays and impact factor

on
0

B - New ideas in science

on
0

B - Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications

on
0

B - Salami publication

on
0

B - Case reports

on
0

B - Peer review simulation

on
0

B - Self-correction in biomedical publications

on
0

B - Research misconduct

on
0

B - Honorary authorship

on
0

B - Japanese randomized controlled trials

on
0

B - Research design of articles in Brazilian physical therapy journals

on
0

B - Citation indices of Korean scientific journals

on
0

B - Medical writing and ghostwriting

on
0

B - Tips for non-native English speakers editors

on
0

B - Gender disparities in science

on
0

B - Legal remedies for ghostwriting

on
0

B - Standards on responsible research publication

on
0

B - Dealing with peer review

on
0

B - Publishing in nursing

on
0

B - Research funded by drug industry

on
0

B - Methods of assessing a scientific paper

on
0

B - Open peer review: a review of the literature

on
0

B - Bibliometric indicators of Russian journals

on
0

B - Reducing waste from reports of biomedical research

on
0