Posts

B - Teaching scientific editing

on
0

B - What makes a good title?

on
0

B - Benchmarking biomedical publications

on
0

B - Use of double dummy trial

on
0

B - Editing across borders

on
0

B - Gender differences in research collaboration

on
0

B - Redefining misconduct

on
0

B - Research ethics: authorship

on
0

B - Iranian registry of clinical trials

on
0

B - Research misconduct

on
0

B - Open data sharing in the context of bioresources

on
0

B - Gender differences in UK research funding

on
0

B - New roles for health sciences librarians

on
0

B - Research data referencing

on
0

B - BioRxiv preprint website for bioscience

on
0

B - Libyan Journal of Medicine

on
0

B - Science communication to general public

on
0

B- Impact factor and citation performance

on
0

B - Journal rankings

on
0

B - Raw data availability from clinical trials

on
0

B - BMJ Case reports

on
0

B - Defending against plagiarism

on
0

B - Internationalization of Chinese STM journals

on
0

B - National vs international journals

on
0

B - Is there an apartheid in science publishing?

on
0

B - Journal rank and study impact

on
0

B - Journal's publisher country and citation rates

on
0

B - Normalization of citation impact

on
0

B - Data transparency in medical communication

on
0

B - Older people in clinical research

on
2

B - Reporting guidelines

on
0

B - Science editing

on
0

B - Ethical authorship in industry publications

on
0

B - Transparency declaration for research article

on
0

B - Honorary authorship in biomedical journals

on
0

B - New authorship criterion

on
0

B - Bibliographic databases: critical points

on
0

B - Web science in medicine and healthcare

on
0

B - Open access: the true cost of science publishing

on
0

B - Conflict of interest in OA publishing

on
0

B - Open access: changing global science publishing

on
0

B - Medical publication and scientometrics

on
0

B - A reviewer index

on
0

B - Reporting medical research

on
0

B - Choosing the target journal

on
0

B - Use of h-index in chemical research

on
1

B - Utility of style guides

on
0

B - Visibility of retractions

on
0

B - Duplicate systematic reviews

on
0

B - Citation and IF distributions of scientific journals

on
0

B - Impact factor for journal scientometrics

on
0

B - Reconsidering the Declaration of Helsinki

on
0

B - The Lancet journals new OA policy

on
0

B - Quality of reports on RCT's in Iranian journals

on
0

B - Peer review: past, present and future

on
0

B - Publishing function

on
0

B - Prescribed practices of authorship

on
0

B - Impact factor distortions

on
0

B - Predatory scholarly publishing

on
0

B - Peer review: nuts and bolts

on
0

B - Evaluations by peer review

on
0

B - Acta Informatica Medica indexed in PubMed

on
0

B - Altmetrics for institutional repositories

on
0

B - Bioresources sharing and traceability

on
0

B - Cost effectiveness for open access journals

on
0

B - Open access and altmetrics

on
0

B - Medical writing in the Middle East

on
0

B - Health research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

on
0

B - Integrity of clinical trial evidence

on
0

B - Modules for teaching publication writers

on
0

B - Peer review impact

on
0

B - Peer review evaluation

on
0

B - Relationship between information literacy and creativity

on
0

B - Acta Medica Academica indexed in PubMed

on
0

B - Characteristics of randomized controlled trials

on
0

B - Influences of media on social movements

on
0

B - Are alternative metrics still alternative?

on
0

B - Publication ethics in the UK

on
0

B - Technology and discipline

on
0

B - The determinants of open access publishing

on
0

B - The structured abstracts

on
0

B - Editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines

on
0

B - Traditional and open access publishing in oncology

on
0

B - Open vs blinded peer review

on
0

B - Editing in the digital world - Conference

on
0

B - Digital licenses replace print prices

on
0

B - Copy-editing of research papers

on
1

B - Medical writer education

on
0

B - The San Francisco Declaration on research assessment

on
0

B - Teaching scientific writing

on
0

B - Six red flags for suspect work

on
0

B - Reporting of research studies in rheumatology

on
0

B - Precepts on writer's attitude

on
0

B - Scientific publications in Nepal

on
0

B - How to write a scientific manuscript

on
0

B - Reporting guidelines

on
0

B - Biomedical publications in Gulf Cooperation Council countries

on
0

B - Publication ethics in biomedical journals

on
0

B - Challenges for authors and publishers

on
0

B - Publication of results from clinical trials

on
0

B - Management of errors and scientific fraud

on
0

B - Peer reviewers can be credited as authors

on
0

B - Referencing accuracy

on
0