Posts

B - Peer review

on
0

B - Write when you can and submit when you are ready

on
0

B - Global scientific collaboration

on
0

B - Chinese Academy of Sciences' role

on
0

B - Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor

on
0

B - Editorial independence and ethics

on
0

B - Citations received by DOAJ's journals

on
0

B- Strange attractors in the Web of Science database

on
0

B - What researchers want

on
0

B - PrestigeRank: A new evaluation method for papers and journals

on
0

B - Gender mainstreaming in editorial policies

on
0

B - Multiple open access availability and citation impact

on
0

B - Impact factors and editing of medical journals

on
0

B - Open online review

on
0

B - Unpublished results hide the decline effect

on
0

B - Collaborator proximity as a predictor of scientific impact

on
0

B - Are scientists good communicators?

on
0

B - Public access to publicly funded research

on
0

B - Scientists prefer reading over publishing open access papers

on
0

B - OA Repositories: the researchers' point of view

on
0

B - Publishers' opinion about open access

on
1

B- Predictive validity of editorial decisions

on
0

B - E-publication bias

on
0

B - Is open peer review the fairest system?

on
0

B- What price quality?

on
0